|
|
Assessment
Primer: Learning Taxonomies
Affective Domain - Krathwohl's Taxonomy
Bloom's Taxonomy second domain, the Affective Domain, was detailed
by Bloom, Krathwhol and Masia in 1964 (Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives: Volume II, The Affective Domain). Bloom's
theory advocates this structure and sequence for developing attitude – also
now commonly expressed in personal development as 'beliefs'.

Krathwohl's affective domain taxonomy is perhaps the best known
of any of the affective taxonomies.
A description of the levels is given here
(1 page ).
Psychomotor Domain
Various people have since built on Bloom's work, notably in the
third domain, the 'psychomotor' or skills, which Bloom originally
identified in a broad sense, but which he never fully detailed. This
was apparently because Bloom and his colleagues felt that the academic
environment held insufficient expertise to analyze and create a
suitable reliable structure for the physical ability 'Psychomotor'
domain. As a result, there are several different contributors
providing work in this third domain, such as Simpson and Harrow
which are described below.
Harrow's Taxonomy
The psychomotor domain taxonomy due to Harrow is organized according
to the degree of coordination including involuntary responses
as well as learned capabilities. Simple reflexes begin
at the lowest level of the taxonomy, while complex neuromuscular
coordination make up the highest level.

Simpson’s Taxonomy
The psychomotor domain includes physical movement, coordination,
and use of the motor-skill areas. Development of these skills
requires practice and is measured in terms of speed, precision, distance,
procedures, or techniques in execution.
Simpson’s seven major categories listed from the simplest behavior to the most complex are shown here
(1 page ) .
|